03 Nov [25.11.03]Differentiating Cosmetic Packaging Lead Time: Existing Molds vs. No Existing Molds
Cosmetic brands are now in their golden window period for launching new products, where there is no time to waste. Packaging lead time, as that “visual business card” of a product, defines the launch date. Most brands ask themselves: why can lead times for customized packaging differ by dozens of days? The question resides in a fundamental requirement–if existing molds are available. The reasoning of lead times under these two circumstances obfuscates specific elements that affect efficiency.
I. Existing Molds: Focus on Efficiency, but Don’t Be A Bottleneck in 4 Stages
Should the brand select packaging styles with existing molds (e.g., conventional round serum bottles, standard square powder compacts), we can say the lead times are controllable. But there are four big contributing reasons for avoiding “seeming fast but ending in delay”:
1. Pre-production Product Testing: An Important Buffer for Compliant Practice
Even with these molds’ already-built foundation, “safety testing” can be the first check before production. Everything from skin irritation testing for packaging materials (particularly contact packaging such as lipstick tubes and eyeshadow palettes) and sealability testing (to avoid leakage of serums and lotions) through to weather resistance testing (to modify as temperature and humidity changes during transportation) takes 3-5 days to verify. If material incompatibility is detected with a product’s contents (e.g., alcohol-based products corroding a plastic bottle), the replacement of materials and further testing will require an additional 3-7 days. However, this step completely precludes mass rework.
2. Process And Design Specifics: What is a “Waiting Time”?
A lot of brands stand out in processes tailored to consumers, like gold stamping on bottle bodies, gradient UV coating on boxes, and flocked linings on inner boxes. These first need to be sampled for approval: check the clarity of gold-stamped text, whether the UV gloss meets expectations, and the quality of flocking density. The sampling and adjusting process cycle takes 5-7 days each time. Regular adjustments to design plans (e.g., logo position adjustment and process effects iteration) will, in turn, increase the confirmation cycle. Brands are advised to pre-emptively state design requirements to minimize mid-project alterations.
3. Peak-Season Factory Production Schedules: “Lock in Advance”
Cosmetic packaging has clearly defined peak seasons of production (such as pre-e-commerce promotions and/or holiday new product launches). Factory orders skyrocket during these seasons. If you do not lock in production schedules 1-2 months in advance, you may wait 10-15 days for scheduling. Especially when packaging involves multiple processes (injection molding, printing, assembly), each needs to be coordinated. Between-process waiting times during peak seasons are 30% higher than off-seasons. That is why advance planning is necessary to avoid “scheduling bottlenecks.”
4. Cross-Border Logistics: “Uncertain Aspects” in Customs Clearance & Shipping
Shipping of packaging materials (like acrylic imports; special metal components) as well as finished products across borders requires a logistics buffer: sea freight takes 20-30 days but may be delayed by 1-2 weeks in case of port congestion or incomplete customs clearance paperwork; air freight can reduce the schedule to 3-7 days but at the cost of extra expenses. In conclusion, brands are urged to select transport modes that match launch urgency and submit customs clearance documents in advance to minimize delivery delays.
II. Without Existing Molds: A 30-Day Minimum Development Schedule, 5 Stages to “Refine” Precision
When brands require entirely new structures (e.g., irregularly shaped bottles, rotating lipstick tubes) or unique appearances, mold development starts at the concept level, considerably lengthening lead times. The 30-day cycle is the fastest, but for complex projects with multiple needs or frequent requirement changes, the cycle may take 2 months or longer. The key lies in 5 “non-negotiable” development stages:
1. Mold And Feasibility Research: Avoid “Inherent Flaws”
Engineers create 3D mold diagrams for packages based on packaging dimensions, structures (number of buckles/opening/closing modes), and materials (PP/PET/acrylic). They also need to account for the flow and cooling rates of these materials during injection molding to avoid subsequent bubbles or distortions. Once the design is finalized for review, technical, production, and quality control teams verify it together (e.g., whether mold life can support mass production). Adjustments for structural revisions take at least 3-5 days.
2. Mold Preparation: Accuracy Determines “Finished Product Quality”
When the design is confirmed, production commences using CNC machines and EDM (electrical discharge machining). The error must be minimized to within 0.01mm (the same diameter as 1/7 of a human hair). Conventional structure molds take 10-12 days to produce; for more complex manufacturing types (e.g., two-color injection molding or insert molding for bottles with metal buckles), the difficulty doubles and the cycle increases by another 5-7 days.
3. 3D Sample Testing: Check “Aesthetics” Before “Functionality”
Once the first mold prototype is produced, “hand samples” are created to validate appearance (e.g., bottle shape and logo clarity), basic dimensions (cap-bottle fit), and standard measurements. If any dimensional deviations are detected (e.g., overly tight opening/closing), the mold needs to be retested and revised, with the process repeating every 3-4 days. Each successive revision prolongs the cycle.
4. Engineering Sample Testing: Full Evaluation of “Functionality”
After 3D samples are approved, 50-100 engineering samples are developed for extreme testing: transportation drop tests (impact resistance), opening/closing tests (buckle durability), and product content immersion tests (material compatibility). If tests fail (e.g., buckles break after 100 openings/closings), mold structures require re-optimization, which can take 7-10 days.
5. Production of Mold Trials: “Pilot Run” For Mass Production
The final stage is small-batch trial production (1,000-2,000 pieces) to validate the stability of mold manufacturing (hourly defect rate). Mold parameters (e.g., injection temperature, pressure) are then fine-tuned over 2-3 days until trial production meets standards, allowing the mold to be fully used for mass production.
Conclusion: Controllable Lead Times Start with “Advance Planning”
The essence of cosmetic packaging lead times is not about being “fast,” but about being accurate. With existing molds, brands should start projects 1-2 months early to allow time for testing and process confirmation; without existing molds, they should communicate requirements at least 3 months in advance to avoid frequent mid-project design revisions. Combined with meticulous mold development and smooth production processes, the product’s “first impression” will not only be beautiful but also on time for the golden launch moment.
Anyway, if you need packaging to arrive at your warehouse/filling company, you should let your sales know that to offer you a workable solution.
Contact our professional sales team to get a timeline for free!